Life, The Universe and a Huddersfield Man
Silbury Dawning The Alien Visitor Gene Theory.
The Debate
From Peter Piwowarski, Yorkshire.
Whilst having not read this book yet (it is on order
from Amazon) I do feel that John has an interesting slant on the
foundation of ancient and yet advanced civilizations on this small
planet in the immeasurable vastness of the universe.
Why did these civilizations suddenly appear and then
die out? One can only begin to imagine the advancement of the human
race as a whole should these civilizations continued to evolve over
the ages. Where would we have been now if the Ancient Greeks or
Egyptians continued in their evolution up to the present day.
But the civilizations declined and, whilst it would
be easy to say it was a natural progression of evolution, I feel
that there is more to this than meets the eye.
If this is so then perhaps our own 'civilization'
is destined to decline in the same spectacular fashion.
Perhaps then John could be correct with his alien
intervention theory and the previous great civilizations have been
terminated by a greater 'being' for one of several reasons. Perhaps
the civilizations were experiments that reached their successful
conclusion. Perhaps the experimenters were afraid that, if these
civlisations were allowed to flourish, the specimens could turn
the tables. Whatever the reason there is certainly food for thought.
Having read the response from Bill Sykes I have to
disagree with him on one point and that is his theory about the
human being 'living on' after death. My own personal feelings are
that when we pass away our component parts (atoms, molecules etc)
are dispersed back from whence they came. A useful anology here
would be to compare our electrical impulses as one would view any
energy such as heat. This is dispersed through its interaction with
the surrounding environment and eventually becomes part of it.
As I have mentioned in the main Philosophy
section I feel quite strongly that man overexaggerates his importance
in the great scheme of things and thinks that, through his intellect,
he will find the answer to everything.
I beg to differ and the more I exercise my power of thought the
more I become convinced that the answer to the question 'Why?' is
impossible to answer.
This doesn't mean that scientists should stop striving
to find this answer because they make important side discoveries
while chasing the Holy Grail. But infinity is immeasurable and infinity
is a reality So how can one reach a conclusion when a variable is
infinity? Defies logic. Perhaps someone out there could give me
a help here and lead me down a new path.
Multi-Dimensional Thoughts
There is a separate theory that more than one dimension
exists in the same place, at the same time, but are slightly out
of phase with each other. But at certain places in the world the
phasing is not as pronounced and there are occasions where more
than one dimension co-exists at exactly the same time.
These could be described as ‘worm holes’ a la Star Trek
(and even terminology used in today’s quantum physics theory)
but it is something a little more complex than that.
All too often the unexplained is passed off as folklore, anomalies,
legend etc., when there could be a valid cause for these events.
Perhaps we have not yet discovered a means of measuring or detecting
coincidental dimensional relativity thus making it impossible to
prove or disprove their existence.
At present the only method of calculation is the imagination.
Take certain events that have occurred throughout history. U.F.O.
sightings, the Loch Ness Monster, the Yeti, the Marie Celeste, the
Bermuda Triangle, to name but a few.
What if these events occurred because of natural dimensional alignment?
Just suppose, take the time to think about it, flex your imagination.
It is as real as the theories that quantum physics throws up in
so far as no one can prove that fact is not fiction and vice versa.
What gives theoretical scientists the right to assume that the
imagination is not as valid a tool as formulae and calculus?
|
