Angles, Danes and Norse
in the District of Huddersfield
By W. G. Collingwood
HIGH HOYLAND AND THE NORSE SETTLERS
This is another tenth century chapel which seems to have
been disused at the Norman conquest and revived later.
In the church on a shelf are two stones (a,b,c,
d,e,f) which represent one cross-head, or possibly
two heads, or late Anglian form.

Two more stones are built into the north wall inside the
church. One of these (g) is similar in
general form to a group of crosses in an area including
the West Riding with South Lancashire and Cheshire; examples
occur at Aberford, Burnsall, Collingham, Kirkby Wharfe,
Saxton and Staveley; at Aughton, Bolton and Whalley, and
in the Cheadle cross already mentioned. But this is not
a Cumbrian type, or we should be inclined to suggest a Cumbrian
origin as distinct from the influences received from the
old Northumbrian and more recent Danish art. The ornament
on these stones is late Anglian, and the area is that which
fell for a time under Mercian power, when Eadward the Elder
built a fort at Manchester in 920. at that time the Norse
had hardly begun to settle in Cumberland, though they had
made a colony in the Wirral; and for a short period all
this area – non-Danish, not yet Norse, and without
British rule – must have felt a revival of Anglian
interests under the control of Mercia. Some such circumstances
seem required to explain the spread of a peculiar type of
monument over that area; and these cross-heads with expanded
or fan-shaped arms may have been then introduced. Carrying
the design a little further in the same direction, we get
the next development (h,i) , the truly
penannular head, found over a different area.
About 930-945 we find a remarkable increase of Cumbrian
influence. The old Kingdom of Strathclyde and Cumberland
had been pushing southward, and under King Owain, and his
son, King Duvenald (known in local tradition as Dunmail),
had come into collision with the southern Kings Aethelstan
and Eadmund. One source of Cumbrian strength was the Norse
colony which Owain patronized; it was eventually the reason
for the destruction of the Cumbrian kingdom in 945, for
the English of the south could not tolerate the settlements
of these pirates, as they regarded them. But there are indications
that Owain and Duvenald included a part of Lancashire and
West Yorkshire in the sphere of interest they claimed. In
a life of St. Cadroe, written in the eleventh century, (printed
in Skene’s Chronicles of the Picts and Scots), the
journey of the saint from Cumbria to York is narrated, and
it is said that he went under escort from King Duvenald
until he came to the civitas (city or state) of Leeds, "which
is the border between the Cumbrians and the Northmen (Danes)."
This would be in about 941, and though the source is one
of the lives of saints in which many miraculous stories
are interwoven, the statement receives curious confirmation
from the next stone we have to look at.
(hi) A cross-head, now apparently split
before being built into the church-wall somewhat recently,
but of a shape not elsewhere seen in Yorkshire. The fan-shaped
cross-arms have so overgrown their earlier form that they
touch one another, and are separated only by a narrow groove.
Without the groove it would be a wheel-head.
Now this is the form of the famous Whithorn group, of which
there are many examples in Galloway. Two of the Galloway
crosses of this type bear inscriptions in the Anglian language
and in Anglian runes; showing that the people of Whithorn
in Galloway used Anglina workmanship. When we remember that
about 940, one dominion – not very strong, nor long-lasting,
but still one realm – extended from the West Riding
to Ayrshire, we can understand how easily, at that moment,
the Yorkshire cross-head, then a new invention, could be
carried so far. Without these circumstances, again, it is
difficult to account for the spread of the fashion in that
particular direction.
More than that, it gives us a date not only for this cross,
but also for the first immigration of Norse into our district.
About 930-945 they were beginning to penetrate from the
coasts of the Irish Sea inland, having begun, a little earlier,
to settle in Cumberland. They came, at any rate for the
most part, not immediately from Norway, but were sons or
grandsons of Norwegians who had fled from King Harald Fairhair
to the Hebrides and Ireland; and they had adopted some Celtic
customs, they used some Gaelic words, and they bore, in
some cases, Irish or Scottish names, the result of intermarriage
with the Gaels. They were, a little later, the dominant
power at York until the middle of the tenth century, as
well as at Dublin; and it was only by the strenuous and
persistent efforts of the kings of southern England that
they did not become the dominant power in Britain. Their
remains, in place-names and monuments, show that they approached
our district through Craven, not in a body as conquerors,
but in isolated families as settlers; taking up land fit
for sheep-farming, which was their speciality as opposed
to the corn and cattle farming of the Angles. Hence we find
them pushing up valleys higher than previous settlers, and
making use of the moorlands as they did at the same time
in Iceland. They were already acquainted with Celtic Christianity;
some were converted to it, but others were like one of their
number who is said to have prayed to Christ when he was
at home, but to Thor "when he was at sea or in a tight
place."
So turning once more to the map we can trace their place-names.
A few, such as Clifton, Dalton, Hartshead and Hopton, can
be explained as Anglian, but are perhaps not of the original
Anglian settlement. Clifton may be from Anglian Clif or
Norse Klif; Dalton from Anglian dael, valley, or dael, piece
(of land), or from Norse dalr, dale; Hopton from Anglian
hop, small valley, or Norse hop, inlet or nook. Hartshead
looks like Anglian for the "height of hart"; but
so many similar names in –head are from the Norse
for "seat" or "estate" that in this
case the form does not decide the date. The following from
Domesday Book, appear to have Norse character:- Crosland
North and South, "land of the cross," with the
Norse form of the word; Fixby, "dwelling of fegh,"
the name also of a landowner in Giggleswick (Domesday Book),
and, in the Celtic form Fiacc, of a Norseman, son of Thorleif
(a regular Norse name), recorded on a cross at Braddan,
Isle of Man; Flockton "farm of Floki," a Norse
name occurring at this period in Iceland; Golcar, Gudlagesarg,
the "erg" Norse for dairy, of Gudlaug; Greetland
"stoney land"; Holme, originally Holne, confused
later with the Norse holmr, "meadow by a river";
Lepton, the "farm on a strip" of land; Meltham,
in which the termination may be the not uncommon Norse heimr,
"home" and like meltu-hus, malthouse, the place
noted for malt; Mirfield, "swampy field" ; Quarmby,
in 1086 Cornesbi, later Querneby and Quarnby, the farm house
of the quern or hand-mill, so altered, probably to explain
a forgotten original something like kvarans-baer, Cuaran’s-by,
from a well known Gaelic-Norse nickname; Rastrick, which
Mr. Goodall interprets "rest-nook" Sowerby, "muddy-farm"
a name found wherever the Norse settled; Stainland, "rocky
land"; Thurlstone, "Thorolf’s farm";
Thurstonland, "Thorstein’s estate"; Wooldale,
"Ulf’s dale"; And Yateholme, in which "Yate"
is an addition later than Domesday Book to the Norse "holme,"
representing, as said above "holne," perhaps "holly."
Also there are a few names of heathen "howes"
or burial mounds, which must date before the conversion.
Bordering on our district are Flanshaw, the "cairn
of Flann," another Gaelic-Norse name, and Carlinghow,
"mound of the old women." So that when we find
Slithero, parallel with Slidrihou (mentioned about 1213
as near Southport) it suggests another Norse cairn. Mr.
Goodall interprets it as "scabbard howe." But
it might be from slidhr, "fearful" (the –r
being part of the word and not merely the nominative termination)
meaning the haunted howe. There are for example, the tumulus
on Banniside, near Coniston, Lancashire, had its ghost,
and a circle in Cumberland was anciently called Elf-how,
now Elva.
Reference may be made also to Mr. Waltar E. Haigh’s
glossary of the Huddersfield district and to Professor Tolkein’s
introduction to that valuable work, for the remains of the
Scandinavian element in local dialect, confirming the evidence
of monuments and place-names.

© Copyright of Kirklees Museums and Galleries
|