Huddersfield in Roman Times
By Ian A. Richmond
ROMAN PIONEERS IN THE HUDDERSFIELD DISTRICT
A.D. 71-79
THE ARMY OF OCCUPATION
Apart from the great power of destruction which science
has given to modern armies, most of them differ considerably
from the Roman Imperial Army in being short-service forces.
After the reign of Tiberius (A.D. 14-36), all Roman soldiers,
whether serving as legionaries or as auxiliaries (excepting,
however, the “Household Troops” at Rome), spent
twenty-five years with the colours. This produced both efficiency
and stability, for the legionaries, as Roman citizens, were
allowed to marry, and auxiliaries might contract a union
which was recognised by law when the received Roman citizenship
on their discharge. These “wives,” however,
never lived within the barracks; but around a fort or fortress
there grew up a village populated by women, children and
traders, which under favourable conditions, as at York,
became a town. The legionaries were Roman citizens born
and bred, and thus were recruited from the more civilised
parts of the Empire; for the Roman citizenship, unless possessed
by its owner as a birthright, always was bestowed as a reward
for the attainment of culture or, occasionally, for great
valour, until in A.D. 212 the Emperor Antonius (nicknamed
Caracalla) extended it to all free-born Roman subjects,
except the Egyptian fellahin. The auxiliary troops, on the
other hand, were commanded by Roman citizens, and were recruited
from less civilised but not barbaric provincials who had
not yet reached the level of culture required for Roman
citizenship. As noted above, they received the citizenship
when they were discharged.
It is difficult to define what arms and armour the auxiliaries
used as a whole, since each regiment was allowed to retain
its native weapons if they were effective, although it was
not recruited from its native district after its foundation,
but from wherever it happened to be stationed. Accordingly
Syrians formed regiments of archers, and Raetians from modern
Austria used their own type of spear, called “gaesum.”
Other tribes provided excellent cavalry or pioneers; the
Batavi, for example, who lived in the fens at the mouth
or the river Rhine, often were useful on campaigns when
swimming was necessary. Spear, sword and shield, however,
formed the chief service equipment of these auxiliaries.
Their organisation and division into units will be explained
presently.

Relief From Trajan's Column: Fort Building
By Legionaries
The armour of the legionary was more substantial. A metal
corselet and shoulder-pieces protected his chest and shoulders
and his head was covered by a large brazen helmet, with
a splendid crest, which was not worn on active service.
His principal fighting weapons were a short sword for stabbing
and two long javelins, which were hurled against the enemy
before coming to close quarters. Each man also carried a
large oblong shield which could be interlocked at need on
all sides with those of his companions, so as to form either
a strong breast-work against attack or a slanting protection
against missiles, like the shell of a “tortoise,”
as the formation was called. Less cumbersome armour was
supplied to the cavalry attached to each legion.

Relief From Trajan's Column: Cavalry
These men were clad mostly in leather for lightness sake,
and equipped with a smaller elliptical shield, a sword and
a lance. The artillery, a less personal weapon, developed
apace in importance and efficiency after the opening of
the first century A.D. These machines were worked by torsion
in a variety of ways, and their effective range seems short
by modern standards, for on the average it was not more
than two or three hundred yards. But since, in western Europe
at least, the normal range of projectiles was the length
that a man could throw, artillery gave to the Romans an
overwhelming superiority, especially in defence. Another
advantage which they possessed was the property built transport
wagon, with two or four wheels. And although there were
no regular ambulances, each legionary fortress contained
a scientifically-planned military hospital, and every legionary
or auxiliary cohort possessed a doctor, whom common talk,
however, did not distinguish from his assistants, calling
both medici.
Methods of campaigning were orderly and precise. Each day
the army preceded by pioneers and scouts (exploratores),
moved forward, with its baggage train in the midst of the
column of route. Each man carried entrenching tools, rations
and cooking pots, while whatever would not be required on
the march was stowed away in the transport carts. By nightfall
the pioneers had selected and marked out the site for an
encampment, and the soldiers set to digging a shallow ditch,
behind which a rather low rampart was made with the upcast
and eventually heightened by stakes. The shape of this earthwork,
a camp in the strict sense of the word, varied according
to the nature of the ground; but wherever possible it conformed
to the rectangle of the Roman text-book. The methods of
setting out a camp of simple shape will be explained later.
Chance has preserved no complicated Roman earthwork in the
Huddersfield district, nor have any traces of a “marching
camp” been detected for certain. But the details here
given should be sufficient to show that Roman army movements
normally observed a definite plan of action; yet they were
not hide-bound, for Hyinus, who appears to have written
in the time of Trajan (A.D. 98-117), gives a notable number
of rules for exceptional circumstances.
© Copyright of Kirklees
Museums and Galleries
|