Huddersfield Soils
By John Grainger
THE CONSTITUENTS OF SOIL
The constituents of soil are:
1 Mineral particles of various sizes and different construction.
2 Organic matter from the decomposition of plants and animals.
3 Various chemical substances, some of which can be used
as plant food.
4 Water with substances in solution, occupying part of the
space between the mineral particles.
5 Air, which fills the spaces between the mineral particles
not occupied by water.
THE MINERAL PARTICLES can be graded into six sizes:
A Stones. . Over 5mm
B Gravel. . Between 5mm and 2mm
C Coarse Sand . Between 2mm and 0.2mm
D Fine Sand. . Between 0.2mm and 0.04mm
E Silt. . . Between 0.04 and 0.002mm
F Clay. . . Below 0.002
Stones are of importance only when they are present in
quantities great enough to obstruct the plough or spade.
This sometimes happens on the shallow sandstone soils of
the district. The unfortunate cultivator must then laboriously
clear his soil of superfluous stone to a sufficient depth
for the wielding of his spade or the driving of his plough.
Gravel neither troubles nor assists the grower of crops
when it occurs in soil. The other four sizes of particles
are, however, of great importance to the farmer or gardener.
They can be considered in two groups, for the coarse and
fine sands are but large and small members of the same family,
whilst silt and clay are from another family. Chemical and
physical differences separate the two groups. Sand particles
are almost pure silica, and are solid; silt and clay are
complex aluminosilicates and are colloidal or jelly-like,
with only a central core of solid material. Soils with a
considerable amount of silt and clay are spoken of as heavy
soils, and those in which sands predominate are lighter
soils. These term refer to the amount of energy required
to work them. It is interesting that sand weighs more than
an equal volume of clay. (Table 1)
TABLE
1 – DENSITY OF SAND AND CLAY |
| WEIGHT
OF 1 CUBIC CENTIMETRE OF DRY MATERIAL |
| |
|
Grams |
| Washed
river sand - Fenay Beck |
1 |
2.556 |
| |
2 |
2.577 |
| |
3 |
2.585 |
| |
Average |
2.572 |
| Glacial
Clay, Ravensknowle |
1 |
2.158 |
| |
2 |
2.152 |
| |
3 |
2.097 |
| |
Average |
2.135 |
Table 2 shows the relative amounts of soil particles in
the four finer grades for the main types of Huddersfield
soils. A large number of estimations were carried out according
to the 1927 International Scale, and the author acknowledges
the valued assistance of Mr. James Walton, B.Sc., and Mr.
George Sheard, B.Sc., with some of the determinations. All
the analyses are not given, but the averages shown in Table
2 are in every way typical of each soil type.
TABLE
2 – AVERAGE MECHANICAL ANALYSES OF HUDDERSFIELD
SOIL TYPES |
| |
COARSE
SAND |
FINE
SAND |
SILT |
CLAY |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
| 1 |
Millstone
Grit sandstone |
17 |
58 |
17 |
6 |
| 2 |
Millstone
Grit shale |
9 |
37 |
28 |
25 |
| 3 |
Coal
Measure sandstone |
11 |
55 |
28 |
6 |
| 4 |
Coal
Measures shale |
5 |
32 |
33 |
35 |
| 5 |
Glacial |
5 |
24 |
36 |
35 |
| 6 |
Alluvial |
13 |
53 |
30 |
3 |
The sandstone soils of both Millstone Grits and Coal Measures
are generally similar in composition, having considerably
more of the large particles, coarse sand and fine sand,
than of the finer silt and clay. They tend to produce a
mat of turf if left as grassland, and are nearly always
subject to summer drought, owing to their superlative drainage
combined with the lack of water-holding power of the coarser
particles. Coal Measure sandstones have usually more silt
particles than Millstone Grit sandstones, a fact which renders
them more retentive of water, and brings greater agricultural
possibilities. Indeed, the plateau from Farnley Tyas to
Thurstonland is a naturally fertile district.
Shale soils have a preponderance of the finer particles
which is slightly greater in the Coal Measures than in the
Millstone Grits. Their average analyses shown in Table 2
do not, however, indicate the profound difference in the
natural supply of mineral nutrients which exists between
those formations.
Glacial soils are the heaviest in the district, usually
having 70 per cent, or more of the finer fractions. Alluvial
soils have usually quite small amounts of clay. Fine sand
appears to be the chief fraction, but there is a sufficiency
of silt to make the soil retentive of water.
It should not be thought that heavy soils are better than
light ground. The cultivator should recognize the particular
qualities of each type, and adjust his work and cropping
to the potentialities of his own plot.
DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN LIGHT AND HEAVY SOIL |
| |
LIGHT
SOILS |
HEAVY
SOILS |
| Maturity
of crops |
Earlier |
Later |
| Working
of the ground |
Can
be worked almost any time |
Cannot
be worked satisfactorily in wet weather; should be dug
or ploughed in autumn |
|
Supply of plant food |
Usually
lower than heavy soils, but usually respond quickly
to manures |
Usually
better supplied than light soils |
| Resistance
to summer drought |
Poor |
Good
|
These indications should only be interpreted in a general
way, for their effects are not always sharply marked. Some
crops, e.g. carrots, grow better on sandy soil than on clay
ground, whilst the marked preference of roses for clay soil
is now almost proverbial.

© Copyright of Kirklees
Museums and Galleries
|